DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0: Which AI Wins in 2025

Free Download

DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 2.0 are the two latest cutting-edge AI models redefining what intelligent systems can achieve. DeepSeek R1 excels in structured reasoning and coding, while Gemini 2.0 shines in multimodal tasks like image and video analysis.

In this guide, we are going to thoroughly perform DeepSeek vs Gemini comparison through different test scenarios, including logic, document handling, coding, and real-world applications. By the end of this guide, you will be able to pick the right AI model for your specific needs.

Part 1. Model Overview: What is DeepSeek R1 & Gemini 2.0

Before we head deep into the DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 comparison, let's quickly clarify the basics of both AI models

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is an open-source, powerful reasoning model designed to solve tasks that require deep problem-solving and advanced reasoning. Released in January 2025, it is optimized for structured problem-solving, coding, and technical tasks. These tasks include algorithm design, debugging complex code, mathematical proofs, data analysis, and logical puzzles.

DeepSeek R1 is useful for developers, researchers, and analysts seeking reliable AI assistance in tackling complex challenges. If you are interested in trying DeepSeek, try UPDF AI and access the full DeepSeek R1 model for free.

deepseek R1 model is now avalianle on updf ai

Gemini 2.0

Gemini 2.0 is the latest AI model by Google available in three variants, i.e., Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 2.0 Pro. Released in January 2025, it's a workhorse model for all daily tasks, such as creative content generation, interactive dialogue, visual analysis, and more. It is exceptional in multimodal AI (text, image, video), research capabilities, and natural conversation.

Gemini 2.0 is useful for professionals in marketing, education, and research looking for a versatile AI model for assistance in day-to-day activities.

Also Read: Google Gemini Review >>

Part 2. Comparative Tests: DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0

To evaluate the strengths of both AI models, we will test them through various test scenarios and compare their performances:

1. Logical & Puzzle Solving

The first test we are doing is testing DeepSeek vs Gemini for logical and puzzle-solving queries. Below are the queries we tested:

Math Puzzle

Prompt: "How many times did Freddie have to paint the number 8 when painting number plates for 100 apartments?"

DeepSeek R1 Response

DeepSeek R1 Response for math puzzle

Gemini 2.0 Response

Gemini 2.0 Response for math puzzle

Logical Reasoning Question

Prompt: "Three boxes are mislabeled: one contains only apples, one only oranges, and one a mix of both. By picking just one fruit from one box, determine the correct labels for all boxes. Explain your logical process."

DeepSeek R1 Response

DeepSeek R1 Response for Logical Reasoning Question

Gemini 2.0 Response

Gemini 2.0 Response for Logical Reasoning Question

Riddle

Prompt: "I speak without a mouth and hear without ears. I have no body, but I come alive with wind. What am I? Provide your answer and explain your thought process."

DeepSeek R1 Response

DeepSeek R1 Response for riddle

Gemini 2.0 Response

Gemini 2.0 Response for riddle

Verdict:

  • Accuracy: DeepSeek 98% | Gemini 95%
  • Explanation Quality: DeepSeek (Extensive explanation) | Gemini (To-the-point explanation)
  • Problem-Solving Steps: DeepSeek (Detailed) | Gemini (Short and easy-to-read)

Overall, DeepSeek provides more accurate and extensive answers with in-depth reasoning. In contrast, Gemini offers creative explanations that incorporate contextual understanding. Simply put, DeepSeek-R1 prioritizes accuracy and structure, while Gemini 2.0 balances accuracy with interpretative flexibility.

2. Document Analysis

Next in our DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 comparison, we are testing the document analysis capabilities of both models. We are uploading the same PDF files to both of them and asking to:

Summarize

Prompt: "Summarize this research paper in 500 words."

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek summarizes document

Gemini Response

Gemini summarizes document

Translate

Prompt: "Translate this content from the PDF in German: [paste content]"

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek translates document

Gemini Response

Gemini translates document

Explain

Prompt: "The research paper has talked about "K-Nearest neighbour algorithm". Can you explain it properly."

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek explain

Gemini Response

Gemini explain

Verdict

DeepSeek took longer to upload and process the PDF, while Gemini 2.0 does not provide a direct option to upload PDF in the free plan. We had to upload the PDF to Google Drive and then let Gemini 2.0 access it.

Also Read: 3 Indirect Ways to Upload PDFs to Gemini >>

In terms of responses, DeepSeek responses were more insightful and organized. It tried to provide the most value in limited words. Gemini responses were satisfactory, but they lacked the depth we experienced with DeepSeek.

In contrast, UPDF AI is a better tool for analyzing PDFs, as it is powered through ChatGPT and offers more accurate, feature-packed PDF analysis and insights, including support for generating mind maps from PDFs.

Try out UPDF AI for free and test its document analysis features yourself.

3. Coding Proficiency

When comparing DeepSeek vs Gemini, checking their coding proficiency can greatly help identify which suits best to developers. So, we are asking both of them to implement the same algorithm.

Prompt: "Implement the Merge Sort algorithm in Python. Your function should accept an unsorted list of integers and return the sorted list. Include clear comments explaining each step of your approach, handle edge cases (e.g., empty lists), and provide a brief analysis of the time and space complexity of your solution."

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek's Coding Proficiency

Gemini Response

Gemini's Coding Proficiency

Verdict:

DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 code comparison does not have many differences. Both generated almost identical code with proper comments on the logic and implementation. However, DeepSeek R1 provided a more structured explanation of the algorithm's steps, while Gemini 2.0 offered a slightly more concise but equally accurate response.

4. Multimodal Capabilities

Since DeepSeek and Gemini both support image analysis, we gave them the same image and asked them to extract text from the image.

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek's Multimodal Capabilities

Gemini Response

Gemini's Multimodal Capabilities

Verdict:

  • Visual Understanding: DeepSeek (90%) | Gemini (100%)
  • Response Accuracy: DeepSeek (80%) | Gemini (100%)

Although DeepSeek was able to extract the text from the image, it made grammatical mistakes. In contrast, Gemini was exceptional in both visual understanding and response accuracy. Besides that, DeepSeek does not support video analysis, but that's available with Gemini.

Other than DeepSeek and Gemini, you can also use UPDF AI to chat with images. It is powered through ChatGPT and can provide accurate responses about images. Click the below button to try UPDF AI's image chatting feature right away.

5. Real-World Task Assistance

Lastly, we are testing DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.0 with a real-world task. We are asking both to guide on the same business strategy and evaluate the practicality of their responses.

Prompt: "Imagine you are a business consultant for a new AI-powered telemedicine startup aiming to disrupt the healthcare industry. Develop a comprehensive business strategy that includes market analysis, competitive landscape assessment, product roadmap, regulatory considerations, marketing channels, pricing models, and a risk management plan. Your response should offer actionable steps and clear milestones to guide the startup from launch to market leadership."

DeepSeek Response

DeepSeek Response for Real-World Task Assistance

Gemini Response

Gemini's Response for Real-World Task Assistance

Verdict:

  • Detailed Response: DeepSeek R1 response is exceptionally detailed. It also provides useful insights that can make a convincing impact. Gemini 2.0 gave a narrative-driven response, which seems less impactful.
  • Structure: Both have structured the responses into different headings and bullet points, which makes the plan easy to follow.
  • Practicality: DeepSeek R1 response is highly practical with proper actionable steps and clear milestones. Gemini 2.0 also tries to be practical, but lacks depth in its response.

Part 3. Pricing Comparison: Which Offers the Best Value to Money?

From the above DeepSeek vs Gemini comparison, we have seen that both tools have their strengths in specific areas. So, another factor that can help in making a decision between the two is pricing.

The price comparison of DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 2.0 for 1 million token is as follows:

FeatureDeepSeek R1Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input Tokens (per 1M)$0.14 (cache hit) / $0.55 (cache miss)$0.10
Output Tokens (per 1M)$2.19$0.40

Surprisingly, Gemini 2.0 is significantly more cost-friendly than DeepSeek R1. It is 6x cheaper for input tokens (even without cache optimization) and 5.5x cheaper for output tokens. This cost advantage makes Gemini more valuable for high-volume tasks such as document processing, multimodal analysis, and conversational workflows.

Pro Tip

If your workflow revolves heavily around PDF/document analysis, consider UPDF AI. Its fixed quarterly cost of $29 includes unlimited queries, which bypasses per-token costs entirely.

Part 4. Bonus: The Best AI Document Analyzer Powered by ChatGPT & DeepSeek

UPDF AI is the leading AI document analyzer. It provides a powerful AI assistant that lets you analyze documents the way you want. It can summarize, translate, and explain PDF content, generate mind maps, proofread/rewrite/write content, and more.

UPDF's online AI

The best part about UPDF AI is that it is powered by ChatGPT and DeepSeek. ChatGPT is the default model of UPDF AI, but users can freely switch between it and DeepSeek. Simply put, you get a robust AI document analyzer that lets you chat with documents using your preferred AI model.

Try the Full-Size DeepSeek R1 Model

You can use a full size DeepSeek R1 model in UPDF AI. For example, if you want to analyze a complex research paper, you can use DeepSeek R1 for analysis, as follows:

  • Go to the online version of UPDF AI.

  • Click "DeepThink (R1)" to enable DeepSeek R1.
  • Enter the prompt and hit Enter.
enter prompt
  • DeepSeek R1 will first perform thorough reasoning and then provide the most authentic answer to your query.
Use DeepSeek in UPDF AI

Try the Default ChatGPT

Just like DeepSeek, users can easily use ChatGPT in UPDF AI. It is a default AI model, so users don't have to switch to it. Simply open UPDF AI and write the prompts to get answers through ChatGPT. For example, let's say that you want to analyze the financial report. So, the steps would be:

  1. Go to the online version of UPDF AI and upload the PDF.
  2. Enter the prompt about what you want to analyze from the PDF and hit Enter.
  3. UPDF AI will use ChatGPT to analyze the document and answer the prompt.
Use ChatGPT model within UPDF AI

In short, UPDF AI is your complete AI document analyzer that provides an all-in-one place to access ChatGPT and DeepSeek R1 for comprehensive document analysis. Try out UPDF AI now and explore this top-notch AI assistant for free.

Conclusion

DeepSeek vs Gemini comparison has helped us uncover the strengths and weaknesses of both AI models. DeepSeek has dominated for its structured reasoning and logical problem-solving, while  Gemini 2.0 offers superior multimodal capabilities and creative writing. Therefore, the right approach would be to use both of them strategically where they fit the best. However, if you want to use AI for document analysis, then UPDF AI stands out as the clear choice due to its cutting-edge document analysis.

% OFF
$  
  OFF
You can use this limited time coupon to purchase designated UPDF PRO or AI products.

Get limited
time coupons!

Click to receive and use it
Extra {couponPrice}% off coupon Extra ${couponPrice} coupon

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Continued use of this website indicates your acceptance of our privacy policy.